Ainsworth, M. S., M. C. Blehar, E. Oceans and you will S. Wall surface (1978), Activities off accessory: A mental study of the fresh new StrangeSituation, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Bartholomew, K. and you will L. Yards. Horowitz (1991), ‚Attachment appearances one of teenagers: A test from a several-category model‘, Record regarding Identity and Public Therapy, 61, 22644
Brennan, K. A beneficial., C. L. Clark and you will P. Roentgen. Razor (1998), ‚Self-declaration dimensions from mature personal connection: A keen integrative over- view‘, in the J. A great. Simpson and W. S. Rholes (eds.), Attachment concept and you may close relationship, Ny: Guilford Push, pp. 4676
Feeney, J. A. and you can P. Noller (1990), ‚Attachment build as a great predictor out of adult romantic relationships‘, Record out of Character and you can Personal Mindset, 58, 28191
Feeney, J. A great. and you may S. M. Ryan (1994), ‚Attachment concept and you can affected controls: Relationships having health and decisions and loved ones skills away from disease for the a student sample‘, Health Therapy, thirteen, 334-45
Fraley, R. C. kostenlose Insasse Singles Dating-Seite and P. R. Shaver (2000), ‚Adult connection: Theoretic advancements, emerging controversies, and you will unanswered questions‘, Review of General Mindset, 4, 13254
Fraley, Roentgen. C and you will Letter. G. Waller (1998), Adult connection habits: A test of the typological design, Ny: Guilford Drive
Hazan, C. and you can P. R. Shaver (1987), ‚Romantic like conceived given that an attachment process‘, Log of Identity and you may Societal Psychology, 52, 51124
Hendrick, C. and you will S. Hendrick (1986), ‚A idea and you can variety of love‘, Log out of Personality and Personal Mindset, fifty, 3924 02
Levy, K. Letter., S. J. Blatt, and you can P. R. Shaver (1998), ‚Attachment looks and you will adult representations‘, Diary out-of Identification and you will Societal Therapy, 74, 40719
Head, M. (1990), ‚Cross-cultural education out-of attachment teams: Latest training, changing techniques, therefore the thought of conditional strategies‘, Individual Creativity, 33, 486 step one
Mikulincer, Yards., P. Roentgen. Shaver, Y. Sapir-Lavid and you can N. Avihou-Kanza (2009), ‚What’s in heads of securely and you may insecurely attached people? The newest secure-foot script and its contacts that have attachment-concept dimensions‘, Diary out-of Personality and you may Societal Mindset, 97,6153 step 3
Ainsworth mais aussi al.(1978) tested a few of Bowlby’s information using a research try called the ‚strange situation‘. Babies and their caregivers was basically separated and then reunited shortly after a good small amount of time, over a number of attacks. From this test, Ainsworth along with her associates created a great three-classification make of attachment appearances, secure, stressed and you can avoidant. Regardless if Ainsworth ainsi que al. (1978) discovered that most babies had a safe connection layout, the variety of connection appearance seen show the difference in the way this new connection system is organized, a main section of which is the children’s impression out-of whether or not the fresh caregiver could be available and you may receptive if needed (Collins and study, 1990).
Fraley and you may Waller (1998) best if a move is actually required on a gradual assessment out-of connection build, hence produces numerous score. In the early 1990’s a several-category design is actually advised (Bartholomew and Griffin, 1991) and you may is made because the a continuing measurement regarding mature attachment. Bartholomew and you may Horowitz (1991) build a four-class model (Secure, Possessed, Fearful-Avoidant and you will Dismissing-Avoidant) to assess adult connection. Predicated on so it, Griffin and Bartholomew (1994) went on to grow the relationship Level Questionnaire. This level are a 30-goods adult accessory questionnaire you to definitely investigates relationship quality and you may adult connection which is based on a continuing size.
Content
Whenever delegating people with the attachment styles, for the true purpose of the fresh new correlations, next strategy is operating. Towards the parental caregiving style questionnaire (Hazan and Razor, 1986, cited for the Collins and study, 1990), professionals ranked the 3 statements due to the fact enjoying/safe parent/caregiver, anxious/ambivalent otherwise cold caregiver. For every single participant a score obtained on warm caregiver; the average are extracted from the new anxious/ambivalent or cooler caregiver get and you can is actually titled an enthusiastic ‚insecure caregiver score‘.
First and foremost, the brand new actions towards impression of an earlier caregiver had been worry about reports, unlike behavioral findings, plus the current study is targeted on exactly how some body ‚think‘ these people were raised and this can be dissimilar to what in fact occurred. Of course, because of date limits it wasn’t you’ll be able to to take action more a great longitudinal studies; not, this should be thought to own upcoming research.
My enterprise manager and that i will simply understand the surveys and you will answers you render. You are depicted inside try out by the several, that’s indicated near the top of their questionnaires. Thus, you will are completely anonymous in this test.
References
1= definitely not at all like me 2= scarcely just like me step three= quite just like me cuatro= tend to like me 5= extremely at all like me